New law supports advance care directives
As new medical treatment decision-making laws come into effect, Victorians are being urged to consider how their current or future power of attorney planning might be affected.
From 12 March 2018, the existing legal framework for medical treatment decision-making will change in an attempt to provide greater autonomy to potential patients by enabling them to give advance care directives that are legally enforceable under the Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016.
Rigby Cook Lawyers wills and estates associate Rosa Bazzanella said the new legislation brings medical treatment decision-making in line with contemporary views that patients have a right to have their medical treatment preferences respected, even when they lose the capacity to express their wishes.
“It allows Victorians to create legally binding advance care directives to inform the decision-maker’s actions by expressing their specific instructional preferences and values for medical treatment, relating to current and future conditions that health practitioners must comply with,” said Bazzanella.
For the first time, Victorians under the age of 18 with medical decision-making capacity will also be able to prepare an advance care directive.
“Those under the age of 18 will be required to undergo an assessment by a medical practitioner or a psychologist, who must attest to the decision-making capacity of the child, in order for the directive to be legally enforceable. The child is required to understand the nature and effect of each statement made in his or her directive.
“Whether you are looking to appoint a medical treatment decision-maker or have been approached by an individual to be appointed one, it is important to take the time to understand the new terminology and carefully consider the requirements and responsibilities to ensure wishes are upheld.
“Ideally these decisions are made in consultation with health practitioners, friends and family.”
The option will also be available to appoint a support person, whose role would be to assist the individual to make decisions for themselves, by collecting and interpreting information or assisting the person to communicate their decisions.
“If a medical treatment decision-maker is not appointed, health practitioners will be required to identify one to consent to or refuse medical treatment, in accordance with a statutory hierarchy predefined in the Act,” said Bazzanella.
“If the medical treatment decision-maker refuses significant treatment and the health practitioner reasonably believes that the patient’s preferences and values are not known or unable to be inferred then the health practitioner must notify the Public Advocate.
“This highlights the need to not only appoint a medical treatment decision-maker but to also implement and make known your wishes with regard to medical treatment. The decision-maker should also be made aware of the person’s advance care directive to support their exercise of the power.
“Although medical agent appointments, advance care plans and refusal of treatment certificates made under existing laws will continue to be recognised, it is advisable to review these documents to ensure they reflect your wishes.
“If you don’t currently have any documentation in place, now is a good time to consider doing so, to ensure that in the event you are incapable of making your own medical decisions, your medical treatment or wishes are followed without challenge or uncertainly.”
Research shows the rapid growth in healthcare delivery via Hospital in the Home is resulting in...
'Sustaining Clinical Team Performance Through COVID-19' offers support to clinical...
UTS has launched an online degree to provide healthcare managers with the skills needed to make...