Study shows need to customise mask fittings
If the facemask fits, it’s much safer, say Flinders University researchers who have developed a low-cost way to customise N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) for staff on the frontline of the pandemic and respiratory viruses such as influenza.
Researchers say the decrease in ‘leakage’ and greater comfort for the wearer whose face has been personally fitted could also have applications to improving respirator and mask safety in a wide range of industrial settings in health care and beyond.
“Individually and anatomically personalised 3D-printed face frames represent a rapidly scalable technology to significantly improve healthcare worker protection and comfort, and fit-testing pass rates,” said Flinders University cardiology research fellow Darius Chapman.
Working with public hospital workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, Chapman and Professor Anand Ganesan — a clinician and cardiac electrophysiology scientist at Flinders — led the project to compare the performance of personalised 3D-printed frames to improve N95 FFRs test scores against regular respirators.
They used a mobile iPhone camera and an app to produce 3D scans of volunteers’ faces which were then imported into a software program to define each user’s facial structure and features to scale.
A plastic and then silicone-coated frame was then made with a commercially available 3D printer from these individual facial impressions, or virtual scaffolds.
“Overall, the quantitative fit testing significantly improved, as did the respirator comfort and tolerability factor,” Chapman said.
“With further refinement, this system could considerably advance the correct fitting of N95 and other FFRs, which have become increasingly important in our healthcare systems during the pandemic,” Ganesan said.
“The ability to generate the low-cost 3-D-printed mesh from a readily available mobile device technology means that individual face scans can be easily and cost-effectively generated around the world in any location.
“A proposed workflow for this technology could involve the scans being sent direct to fabrication centres, which could be located at a distance from hospitals or other health facilities.
“Further, using readily available consumer-grade 3D printers and materials at low cost could be an important practical advance to decreasing leakage from N95 FFRs in workers as well as other people at high risk of severe outcomes from respiratory virus, like immunocompromised people.”
The study, Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: a prospective crossover trial in health care workers (2023), by Darius Chapman, Campbell Strong, Shahid Ullah, Lauren Richards and Anand N Ganesan, has been published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene.
