The Conversation: A Special Note
Friday, 15 May, 2015
Letter from the Editor
The Conversation has been a valuable source of research-driven commentary over the years. Operating as a not-for-profit publisher it has offered objective, evidence-supported commentary for public consumption free from commercial agenda (something we don't see much of these days). The contributors are leaders in their fields and outstanding communicators who are passionate about improving public understanding of a range of topics from politics to medicine, science, economics, arts and everything that keeps our culture running.
Unfortunately it was announced this week that The Conversation's primary financial supporter, the Australian Government, will be withdrawing their funding. This means The Conversation is in danger of disappearing, and a wealth of knowledge with it, unless they can muster up sufficient donation-based funding.
Today I encourage you to head on over to The Conversation and have a look around at its fantastic content before it disappears.
While not about medicine or healthcare, here is an excellent piece about why public science communication should be encouraged by research institutes:
We need to stop punishing scientists for talking to the public.
Aged care's Single Assessment System has "undermined public confidence", ombudsman finds
The Commonwealth Ombudsman's report also said that the Department of Health, Disability and...
Better questions, clearer choices: putting the person at the centre of continence support
Better continence support begins before a product is chosen. It begins with better questions,...
A Day in the Life of a rural generalist anaesthetist and men's mental health advocate
Dr Hayden Cain is a rural generalist anaesthetist who has a particular interest in men's...
