Medical Board Continues to Fund Victorian Doctors' Health Program
Monday, 14 April, 2014
AMA Victoria welcomes the Medical Board’s announcement that it will continue to fund the Victorian Doctors’ Health Program for a further three years, as it considers its adoption at a national level.
The Victorian Doctors' Health Program (VDHP) is a vital support service for Victoria’s medical workforce. Each year, around 200 Victorian doctors approach the VDHP for the first time, and others rely on it for ongoing support. A 2013 beyondblue survey (National Mental Health Survey of Doctors and Medical Students) found that doctors and medical students reported substantially higher rates of psychological distress and attempted suicide compared to both the Australian population and other Australian professionals.
The Victorian Doctors' Health Program was previously funded completely by the now defunct Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria. Of the medical registration fees, $25 per medical practitioner was allocated towards the VDHP. This funding extension will enable the Medical Board to decide which state-based frameworks are to be implemented in a nationally consistent doctors’ health program.
“The Victorian Doctors' Health Program works extremely well in Victoria and the extended funding of this program is a welcome development. We are confident that as more scrutiny is applied to this program, consideration should be given to implement similar services across the nation as this would be beneficial to all doctors throughout Australia,” AMA Victoria President, Dr Stephen Parnis, said.
Finalists announced for 2024 HESTA Australian Nursing & Midwifery Awards
A midwife who created the nation's first stillbirth support guide for Aboriginal families and...
Common pets behind 12,000 injury hospitalisations: AIHW
Cats and dogs, the most common domestic pets in Australia, were responsible for over half (53%)...
Emergency departments busier than ever: report
NSW emergency departments continue to see record numbers of patients, but most patients were...