Private Health Insurance Should Do More For Oral Health

By Sophie Blackshaw
Wednesday, 26 November, 2014


Dental disease was the second most common reason Medibank policy holders needed a visit to the hospital, making up 18% of admissions in the 2014, new data from Medibank Private has shown.


The Australian Dental Association (ADA)'s Schedule and Third Party Committee's Chair Dr Terry Pitsikas AM said that since Medibank has the country's largest number of policy memberships, it's likely that this pattern is applicable to other private health insurance (PHI) policy holders.


“The figures released by Medibank relate to policy holders yet despite having cover for dental care, 18% still needed in-patient hospital care for dental treatment. I am concerned that the Medibank figures might be inflated as Medibank insists on restricting rebates to only two hour dental theatre cases. Restorative cases often require more than two hours of treatment so one has to wonder if the figures also include readmissions for unfinished treatment," Dr Pitsikas said.


"The lack of additional rebate for longer duration cases is unfair to policy holders. Many other insurers do not apply this two hour limit for rebates. The risk of a patient needing a second theatre session because of a private health insurer’s rule is hard to justify."


In spite of continuous premium increases, PHIs have for years failed to increase the level of rebates policy holders receive for preventive and restorative dental treatment such as basic scale and cleans.


The gap between premiums paid and rebates is still increasing. Private health insurers such as Medibank also place limitations on the frequency of treatments and the actual services rebated by them, such as oral examinations and preventive treatments. For the last three years private health insurers have averaged well in excess of $1 billion surplus per annum for general treatment policies and dental care represents about 52% of general treatment services.


PHIs place annual monetary limits on the amount of rebates policy holders can receive, even though no such limits apply to rebates for medical services. For some services, policy holders are restricted to a "once in a lifetime" claim even though full premiums are demanded annually by PHI even after a claim has been made.


Dr Pitsikas said: “Restricting policy holders’ access to prevention does not make oral health problems go away. Medibank’s own data shows this.”


Poor oral health has been linked with chronic disease, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This is particularly concerning considering that nine in 10 deaths have chronic disease as an underlying cause.


“Dental disease, such as caries and gum disease are in many cases preventable. PHI need to better support preventive and restorative services so that their policy holders not only avoid dental disease, but also improve their chances of avoiding chronic disease and the hospital too. Many of the restorative issues could be nipped in the bud if detected earlier and avoid many of the hospital admissions," Dr Pitsikas said

Related Articles

Opinion: It's time for Australia to introduce a sugary drinks tax

Sugary drinks cause weight gain and increase the risk of a range of diseases, including...

Collaboration key to improving adherence to physical activity guidelines

We all know that being physically active is important for our health, but getting people to...

Should chatbot psychologists be part of the health system?

This year, an announcement that chatbot psychologists could become part of Australia's...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd